10 cover letter review


cover letter review Enclosed is our latest version of MS #85-02-22-RRRRR, that is, the re-re-re-revised version of our paper. Choke on that. we've got once more rewritten the whole manuscript from begin to end. we tend to even modified the goddamned running head! Hopefully we've got suffered enough by currently to satisfy even your sanguinary reviewers.

I shall skip the same old point-by-point description of each single amendment we tend to created in response to the critiques. After all, it's fairly clear that your reviewers ar less curious about details of scientific procedure than in understanding their temperament issues and sexual frustrations by seeking some kind of unhinged glee within the sadistic and discretionary exercise of tyrannical power over pitiable authors like ourselves WHO happen to fall under their clutches. we tend to do perceive that, visible of the misanthropic psychopaths you've got on your editorial board, you wish to stay causation them papers, for if they weren't reviewing manuscripts they'd most likely be out assault recent girls or symptom baby seals to death. Still, from this batch of reviewers, C was clearly the foremost hostile, and that we request that you simply not raise her or him to review this revision. Indeed, we've got armored letter bombs to four or 5 folks we tend to suspected of being reviewer C, thus if you send the manuscript back to them the review method can be unduly delayed.

Some of the reviewers comments we tend to could not do something regarding. for instance, if (as reviewer C suggested), many of my ancestry were so drawn from different species, it's too late to alter that. different suggestions were enforced, however, and also the paper has improved and benefited. Thus, you steered that we tend to shorten the manuscript by five pages, and that we were ready to try this terribly effectively by fixing the margins and printing the paper during a totally different font with a smaller fount. we tend to believe you that the paper is far higher this fashion.

One unclear drawback was coping with suggestions #13-28 by reviewer B. As you will recall (that is, if you even hassle reading the reviews before doing all of your call letter), that reviewer listed sixteen works the he/she felt we must always cite during this paper. These were on a spread of various topics, none of that had any connection to our work that we tend to might see. Indeed, one was AN essay on the war from a highschool literary magazine. the sole common thread was that each one sixteen were by an equivalent author, presumptively somebody reviewer B greatly admires and feels ought to be a lot of wide cited. To handle this, we've got changed the introduction and more, when the review of relevant literature, a segment entitled "Review of extraneous Literature" that discusses these articles and conjointly punctually addresses a number of the a lot of foolish suggestions by different reviewers.

We hope that you simply are happy with this revision and eventually acknowledge however desperately worth of publication this work is. If not, then you're AN unscrupulous, depraved monster with no shred of human decency. You need to be during a cage. might no matter heritage you come back from be the butt of subsequent spherical of ethnic jokes. If you are doing settle for it, however, we tend to would like to many thanks for your patience and knowledge throughout this method and to precise our appreciation of you pedantic insights. To repay you, we might be happy to review some manuscripts for you; please send America subsequent manuscript that any of those reviewers sends to your journal.

Assuming you settle for this paper, we might conjointly prefer to add a footnote acknowledging your facilitate with this manuscript and to show that we tend to likable this paper far better the method we tend to originally wrote it however you command the editorial piece to our heads and compelled America to cut, reshuffle, restate, hedge, expand, shorten, and generally convert a meaty paper into stir-fried vegetables. we tend to could not or would not, have done it while not your input.

cover letter review

cover letter review 3

cover letter review 4

cover letter review 5

cover letter review 6

cover letter review 7

cover letter review 8

cover letter review 9

cover letter review 10

cover letter review

Tags: #Cover Letter Checklist #Document Review Cover Letter Sample #Harvard Business Review Cover Letter #Harvard Cover Letters #Harvard Resume and Cover Letter #Jimmy Sweeney Cover Letter Reviews #Utilization Review Cover Letter Samples #Writing A Short Cover Letter